Intel Intel

Cookie Wars: Utah Company Sues Competitors Over ‘Confusing Similarities’

Powered By

Featured Solutions: Casualty (Commercial)

A legal battle being referred to as the “Utah cookie wars” has drawn multiple bakers of the classic confection into a dispute over potential intellectual property violations. In July, cookie company Crumbl — which launched in Logan, Utah, in 2017 and has since expanded to 600-plus bakeries in the U.S. — filed infringement lawsuits against competitors Crave and Dirty Dough, alleging both cookie-makers copied their packaging.

According to reports, Crumbl also claims that the brother of Dirty Dough’s founder previously worked for Crumbl and went on to be involved in a “confusingly similar” product. In December, Dirty Dough founder Bennett Maxwell reportedly called the ordeal “silly” and said Crumbl’s lawsuit implies “they own the right to make cookies.”

“Making cookies is not rocket science, so I can see where Dirty Dough is saying that anyone should be able to make cookies,” said Lana Dennis, Underwriter, Commercial Insurance, Burns & Wilcox, Salt Lake City, Utah. “However, I can also understand Crumbl being upset about a former employee who worked there allegedly taking their ideas, which would not be OK.”

Lawsuits over intellectual property are not typically covered on a company’s Commercial General Liability (CGL) Insurance, which could leave companies uninsured for these types of losses if a court rules against them.

‘Huge detrimental consequences’ possible if trade secrets leaked

Intellectual property cases in the U.S. increased “dramatically” between 1996 to 2018, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts reported in 2020. California, New York and Texas accounted for the highest number of intellectual property filings during that time. Intellectual property infringement cases were also rising in Canada as of 2020, Canadian Lawyer reported at the time. According to a 2021 report from legal analytics firm Lex Machina, trade secret case volume has been steady since about 2017, with a majority of cases being resolved by settlement or on procedural grounds.

Companies that have had trade secrets stolen can face serious financial fallout. Even a similar logo could lead customers to mistakenly purchase a competitor’s product.

Given today’s rising costs across the board, companies faced with intellectual property infringement — or allegations that they have committed an intellectual property violation — will also see higher expenses, Dennis said.

“There are definitely more claims happening and the legal costs are higher, just like everything else,” she said. “Not only should they look at their CGL Insurance policy, but Excess Liability Insurance policies are really important as well since they can help provide extra limits. It used to be that companies were not usually hitting their excess limits in a lawsuit, but that is not the case anymore.”

For a cookie company, CGL Insurance is more often associated with coverage for products and completed services, “which would be the cookies,” Dennis said, “or, if someone got sick or someone slipped and fell on the premises, there could be coverage for that.” However, CGL Insurance policies could also include coverage for “personal and advertising injury,” which is a portion of the policy that could pay for legal defense and judgment in the event of a claim with allegations such as libel, slander, defamation, or stolen trade secrets.

“Crumbl is claiming that Dirty Dough’s advertising and packaging are too similar to their own, so that would likely fall underneath the advertising injury,” Dennis explained.

Insurance for intellectual property damages often overlooked

Years before the so-called “Utah cookie wars,” news outlets reported on a “cupcake war” between recipe blog SugarHero and Food Network, when the recipe blogger accused the network of copying a video recipe for her popular “snow globe cupcake,” ColoradoBiz Magazine reported in 2017. Her lawsuit reportedly sought $150,000 in damages for the infringement and subsequent mental distress, People reported.

Intellectual property cases in other industries have led to major settlements. In 2018, Groupon agreed to pay $57 million to IBM to settle a lawsuit that claimed it used IBM’s patented e-commerce technology without permission, Reuters reported. Earlier this year, Boston Scientific agreed to pay $85 million in addition to a previously-court-ordered $20 million to settle claims from Nevro related to spinal cord stimulation patents, MedTech Dive reported in August.

Although a company’s CGL Insurance can pay for the legal defense in an intellectual property case, another type of insurance could extend to the potential damages a court may award, Dennis noted. Intellectual Property Insurance, or a form of Professional Liability Insurance or Errors & Omissions (E&O) Insurance, can be tailored to address copyright infringement and similar situations.

Image

This type of lawsuit could help business owners think outside of the box and expand their coverage, because there is definitely an exposure for your recipes and your trade secrets, and we have products that will cover that. It is just not on a typical CGL Insurance policy.

Many businesses are vulnerable to allegations related to intellectual property and business owners may not realize their CGL Insurance would not be enough to cover potential settlements. These owners should ask their insurance broker for guidance, especially as society becomes more litigious and the risk of being sued grows. Every policy is different and the options should be reviewed with a knowledgeable insurance broker to ensure there are no coverage gaps.

Business owners might not be aware of the risk, and they may assume “trade secrets” only apply to Wall Street. “Anytime a business has a certain way of marketing themselves, they want to protect those,” Dennis said, and media coverage on situations like the claims made by Crumbl could help bring these risks to light. “This type of lawsuit could help business owners think outside of the box and expand their coverage, because there is definitely an exposure for your recipes and your trade secrets, and we have products that will cover that. It is just not on a typical CGL Insurance policy.”

Preparing for the unexpected 

If a company is ordered to remove its products from store shelves due to intellectual property infringement, the expense of doing so could be significant, Dennis pointed out. Business owners should ask their insurance broker about Product Recall Insurance, which could cover this cost and other expenses.

“If they had products out on the shelf, they could have to pull all that product off and make changes,” she said. “The cost of pulling it back could come back to the company and that could be a huge expense. If you are creating a product, consider a Product Recall Insurance policy. Without it, that could be thousands upon thousands of dollars out of your pocket. That could bankrupt a company.”

Cyber and Privacy Liability Insurance is also important, as data breaches could put company data and trade secrets at risk. These policies, along with Excess Liability Insurance, should be discussed early on when starting a new business. Excess Liability Insurance coverage is advisable regardless of the line of business being insured. Losses frequently reach maximum payout limits, and there is potential for catastrophic financial exposure. It is important to discuss appropriate coverage limits with clients to ensure their assets are adequately protected.

To help mitigate the risk of lawsuits or intellectual property violations, companies should consult legal counsel when drafting contracts and ensure that employee handbooks clearly define acceptable workplace behavior. These handbooks should also specify that proprietary company information must remain confidential.

Image

We cannot necessarily decrease the risk of being sued because of the times we live in, but more than worry about being sued, just be covered properly.

Unfortunately, not all lawsuits can be avoided, and it is important to have the right insurance policies in place before an incident or allegation occurs.

“We cannot necessarily decrease the risk of being sued because of the times we live in, but more than worry about being sued, just be covered properly,” Dennis emphasized. “It is very important to take out a CGL Insurance policy but if you do start a company and you have new ideas, new technology or new products, you should look at getting a policy that would cover your intellectual property so that in the event something happens, you have coverage for it. Anytime you start up a company, you want to look at all angles.

Sign Up For Newsletter Updates

Featured Solution(s)

Featured Expert

Similar Articles

Serving you and your clients

To see your local Burns & Wilcox team, please enter your address.

Featured Solutions

Featured Product Line

Cookie Wars: Utah Company Sues Competitors Over ‘Confusing Similarities’

Casualty (Commercial)

All businesses need to protect themselves from third–party property damage and bodily injury liability claims. At Burns & Wilcox, we have

Sign Up for Updates

Sign up to receive the latest industry news and product information from Burns & Wilcox.

×

As wildfires continue to affect communities throughout Los Angeles County, we want to express our heartfelt support for the residents, first responders, and all those working tirelessly to combat these devastating fires.

We understand the challenges posed by this crisis. If you need assistance or have questions about your client's coverage during this time, the team at Burns & Wilcox is here to help.